Review story.....

The story starts with a call from our team-mate Bhuvan zero Raj zero R :) on Sunday evening .He told that there will be project review tomorrow . We were confident enough that we will give the review in a very good way as we had given it on Friday itself.He said that first 10 batches need to give the review which will start at 10 on Monday. Next day it was 10:30 when we went to the board room in our department.As our batch number was three we decided to go at 10:30,thinking that by 10:30 other batches would finish their review. But the story was different there. No one(other batches) had come for the review. As we stepped into the board room we got proper scoldings for all the reasons which start from bunking the class to coming late for the review. Then we were asked to give the review. By that time everything was vanished from our minds.That day morning at 7:30 we noted out the important points to be said.But after getting proper scoldings nothing was there in our minds.

The review started. I was asked "What is your contribution to the project??" The unexpected question for me. I prepared my mind and told about my part in the project. As soon as I completed that the next question was "What is your contribution to the project??". yeah the same question he asked again. I was bewildered why he is asking the same question again. I don't know why he asked again the same question.

I told about the percentage of my work in our project for the second time.Likewise he asked questions I tried my best to answer his questions.Literally I struggled to convince him. He was not letting me to explain in a continuous flow.It was not his fault may be I was nervous to answer all his questions.

It was next Bhuvan's turn. I think Bhuvan will never forget the word "co-occurance".He has put all his physical strength in explaining the word "co-occurance".He attempted to explain by drawing many rows and columns but he could not convince the audience there.But he is confident enough that he will not let happen the same in the next review.

Anusha continued with the Bhuvan's explanation and even she could not convince the audience. "One should understand the audience first and then explain according to his level" was the quote given by our reviewer. At last Apoorva told about her contribution in the project and she also answered some questions regarding our the time efficiency of our project.

Somehow review got over. But we were very disappointed. We didn't talk to each other for sometime. Then Sudarshan sir gave us some tips about how present it there.The best part of the review was that it inspired us a lot to improvise our code to give a better and accurate result(given the proper input). Amidst all these we enjoyed the explanation skills of Bhuvan zero Raj zero R :) :)